Legal Opinion

Ius v. Butcher

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 20, 1987No. Civ. 87-152-FRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

Defendants Dennis J. Regan, Mariko Regan, Omega Research and Development, D.J. Regan, Inc. and Ion Fabrications, Inc. (defendants) move the court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), for an order dismissing the amended complaint on the grounds that 1) plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and 2) plaintiffs have not established personal jurisdiction over Dennis J. Regan, Mariko Regan, D.J. Regan, Inc. or Ion Fabrications, Inc.

In the alternative, defendants move the court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. .§ 1404(a), to transfer this case to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Williamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life ActivistsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1996
  2. Harrison v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
  3. Harrison v. INTERN. ASS'N OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACEDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API