Legal Opinion
Karsten v. McDougall & Sons
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 18, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00748Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SASHA JAIDYN KARSTEN, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-00748-YY v. ORDER MCDOUGALL & SONS, Defendant. Pro se plaintiff Sasha Jaidyn Karsten has filed a complaint alleging discrimination and wrongful termination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and Washington law, WASH. REV. CODE § 49.60.010 et seq. Defendant McDougall & Sons (“McDougall”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss Based on Personal Jurisdiction in which it asks the court to dismiss the case or, in the alternative, transfer the case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.