Legal Opinion

Arrocha v. Panama Canal Commission

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 20, 1985No. 83 Civ. 4520PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge:

This unusual case concerns the venue provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and raises the question of where venue may lie when none of the provisions of that venue statute may be strictly applied to the case at bar. In this action, defendant Panama Canal Commission, 1 as well as defendants McAuliffe and Crews, in their official capacities, 2 have moved to dismiss this action or to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. For the reasons that follow, defendants’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheila M. BOLAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Harrison v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
  3. Foxx v. DaltonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
  4. Harrison v. INTERN. ASS'N OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACEDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
  5. Karsten v. McDougall & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API