Legal Opinion

Anderson v. A.C. & S., Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1992No. 15544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellant, Vernon Ruark, is one of over nine hundred plaintiffs in a series of cases which have been consolidated and designated the “Northern Ohio "firework-er Cases.” These plaintiffs- allege personal injuries resulting from exposure to asbestos. The suits name approximately one hundred fifty different defendants allegedly involved in the mining, manufacturing, distribution and/or sale of asbestos and asbestos-containing products.

In an attempt to control the mass of paperwork and ensure that these cases are expeditiously brought to trial, the trial court has entered several…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ohio Furniture Co. v. MindalaOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Russo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aydin Co. Exchange, Inc. v. Marting RealtyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Owens v. ACS Hotels, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Becker v. MetzgerOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Henry Spack Serv. v. Pietrzak, Unpublished Decision (12-16-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Associated Business Inv. v. Cti Comm., Unpublished Decision (11-22-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API