Legal Opinion

Ohio Furniture Co. v. Mindala

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1986No. 85-415PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues presented in this appeal are: (1) whether Local Rule 11(C) is unconstitutional, and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the case with prejudice. We hold that Local Rule 11(C) is constitutional, but that the trial court improperly dismissed the case with prejudice.

Local Rule 11(C)1 sets forth a seven-day limitation period within which responses to motions must be filed. This rule was passed under the authority of Section 5, Article IV of the Ohio Constitution2 and R.C. 2505.45.3 Appellant filed its response to appellee’s February 1984 motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perotti v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sazima v. ChalkoOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Russo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Wagner v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API