Legal Opinion

Russo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1987No. 12790PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

This case involves the discovery sanction of dismissál of a class action for the plaintiffs’ disobedience of an order to compel answers to interrogatories. The action was filed on April 20, 1979 and dismissed on July 31, 1986.

Plaintiff-appellant John Russo and seven other named plaintiffs filed a complaint on behalf of themselves and other members of the class, being employees of defendant-employer Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”). The members of the class claimed that Goodyear made certain wrongful payroll deductions for reimbursement of an overpayment of supplemental unemployment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Ohio Furniture Co. v. MindalaOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ward v. HesterOhio Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Arnold v. American National Red CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Jamestown Village Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Market Media Research, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bennett v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Haddad v. EnglishOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Harris v. Southwest General HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API