Legal Opinion

Henry Spack Serv. v. Pietrzak, Unpublished Decision (12-16-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2005No. 04 CO 57UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Defendant-Appellant, Mark Pietrzak, appeals the decision of the Columbiana County Court of Common Pleas that granted judgment to Plaintiff-Appellee, Henry Spack Service, Inc. Pietrzak argues that the trial court erred by not granting his motion for discovery sanctions, but he fails to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the trial court's failure to grant his motion. He provided this court with neither a complete transcript of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Laubscher v. BranthooverOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Anderson v. A.C. & S., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Ruvolo v. HomovichOhio Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. StottsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API