A. A. C. v. Miller-Pomlee
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
*108*817Respondent appeals a stalking protective order (SPO) that the trial court entered against him.1 On appeal, respondent contends, among other points, that (1) the trial court erred in "finding that objectively non-threatening text messages constituted *** unwanted contact" for purposes of the civil stalking statute, ORS 30.866 ; (2) the record contained insufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that respondent was "tracking" petitioner's whereabouts; and (3) in any event, "tracking" is not a "contact" sufficient to support entry of an SPO under ORS 30.866. We conclude the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Prince Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Christensen v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benaron v. SimicDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021