Legal Opinion

A. A. C. v. Miller-Pomlee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 2019No. A162876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

*108*817Respondent appeals a stalking protective order (SPO) that the trial court entered against him.1 On appeal, respondent contends, among other points, that (1) the trial court erred in "finding that objectively non-threatening text messages constituted *** unwanted contact" for purposes of the civil stalking statute, ORS 30.866 ; (2) the record contained insufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that respondent was "tracking" petitioner's whereabouts; and (3) in any event, "tracking" is not a "contact" sufficient to support entry of an SPO under ORS 30.866. We conclude the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Prince Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Christensen v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benaron v. SimicDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API