Legal Opinion

Prince Jones v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2017No. 15-CF-322PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Associate .Judge Beckwith for the court, except as to Part II.E.3.

Opinion by Senior Judge Farrell, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, at page 725-26.

Dissenting opinion by Associate Judge Thompson, at page 728-29.

Beckwith, Associate Judge:

A jury, found appellant Prince Jones guilty of various offenses arising out of two alleged incidents of sexual assault and robbery at knifepoint.1 Mr, Jones appeals his convictions on the ground that much of the evidence offered against him at trial was the direct or indirect product of a warrant-less — and thus, Mr. Jones argues,…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anthony Hooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Commonwealth v. AlmonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  3. United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. FredericqMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  5. A. A. C. v. Miller-PomleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API