Legal Opinion

Consolidated Interstate Callahan Mining Co. v. Callahan Mining Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided October 9, 1915No. 628PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Ancillary proceeding for an injunction by the Consolidated Interstate Callahan Mining Company against the Callahan Mining Company and others.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

This is an ancillary proceeding, brought by the petitioner, hereinafter called the Mining Company, to restrain the defendants from further prosecuting a suit in the state court against the petitioner, upon the ground that the court has lost jurisdiction of the cause by reason of its removal to this court. The petition for removal was filed by the Mining Company, named as the defendant in that suit, together with numerous individuals constituting two rival groups of stockholders, each claiming to be the regularly elected board of directors. In Traction Company v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Central Trust Co. v. McGeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Wichita Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Midstate Amusement Corporation v. RiversDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1944
  4. Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
  5. O'Neil v. BirdseyeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API