Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Birdseye

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 6, 1917No. 113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by J. Denny O’Neil, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as receiver of the Pittsburgh Life & Trust Company, against Clarence E. Birdseye and others. On motion to remand to state court.

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, District Judge.

This case was originally started in the state court by a citizen of Pennsylvania, as insurance commissioner of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and as receiver of the Pittsburgh Life & Trust Company, against Clarence E. Birdseye, a citizen of New Jersey, and other defendants, some of whom are residents and citizens of New York. Birdseye alone moves the cause here.

The plaintiff objects, and asks to remand to the state court on the grounds: First, that neither plaintiff nor defendant Birdseye reside in the Southern district of New York; second, that, the re*255moval being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Joy v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Miller v. CliffordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
  4. Baillie v. BackusDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1916
  5. Wabash R. v. West Side Belt R.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. ForemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Del Fungo Giera v. Rockland Light & Power Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
  5. Waterloo Creamery v. National Bank of CommerceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1822

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API