Legal Opinion

Lillico v. Perakos

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 25, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.

The plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the proponent, was a coexecutor of, and a beneficiary under, the will of Eliot Russell, who died on September 11, 1963, at Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, United States. The Probate Court for the district of Berlin, upon proper notice, ordered a hearing on the admission of the will to probate to be held September 19,1963. This hearing was duly adjourned to November 25, 1963, thence to January 6, 1964, and finally to March 23, 1964. One of the disputed issues was whether the decedent, at the time of his death, was domiciled in Charlotte…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. Delehanty v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Berkeley v. BerkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Olmstead's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maloney v. TaplinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Kohn Display & Woodworking Co. v. Paragon Paint & Varnish Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  3. General Consolidated, Ltd. v. Rudnick & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  4. Chartier v. ValliereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  5. Chartier v. ValliereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API