Legal Opinion

Reid v. Minter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1975No. 50917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

This case, tried before the court without a jury, is a casualty of Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471), reversing this court’s judgment in 133 Ga. App. 613 (211 SE2d 642), conformed to in 135 Ga. App. 337. As a result of that litigation it is now firmly established that findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a) are mandatory; that the facts must be found specially; and that conclusions of law must be stated separately, regardless of whether the order otherwise is sufficient for purposes of review. The distinction between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyal Development Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Doyal Development Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Doyal Development Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crook v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Leasing International, Inc. v. PlemonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Reid v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Minter v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API