Legal Opinion
Doyal Development Co. v. Blair
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 29, 1975No. 29717PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
In our opinion findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a) are mandatory. Ga. L. 1969, pp. 645, 646; 1970, pp. 170, 171. Statements to the contrary appearing in Faucette v. Faucette, 228 Ga. 201 (184 SE2d 586) and Collins v. Collins, 231 Ga. 683 (1) (203 SE2d 524) are disapproved. The conclusions of law entered nunc pro tunc by the trial court were not considered by the Court of Appeals and are not considered here. See Jacobs Pharmacy Co. v. Richard & Associates, Inc., 229 Ga. 156 (1) (189 SE2d 853); Warren v. Walton, 231 Ga. 495, 500 (2) (202 SE2d 405).
Judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warren v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Jacobs Pharmacy Co. v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Faucette v. FaucetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by46 opinions
- Crook v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Githens v. GithensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Pruitt v. First National Bank of Habersham CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Beasley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.