Legal Opinion

Reid v. Minter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1976No. 51775PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

In this action for fraud and deceit in the sale of a house, plaintiffs (appellants) seek damages for the diminished value of their flooded house purchased from the named defendant and her agents (appellees). Prior to trial, plaintiffs presented an oral motion for partial summary judgment on the issues of liability. This motion was granted on the basis of defendants having failed to file their answers within 30 days after service as required by Code Ann. § 81A-136 (a) to plaintiffs’ discovery requests which sought admissions as to all the elements of fraud. The issue of liability…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Windsor Forest, Inc. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Brewer v. GittingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Anglin v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Tallent v. McKelveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. McLendon v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mercer v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Minter v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Pritchett v. AndingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API