Legal Opinion
Doyal Development Co. v. Blair
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 5, 1974No. 49799, 49800PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Judge.
1. "The appellants contend that the trial court erred in entering judgment against them without first finding the facts specially and in failing to state separately its conclusions of law as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152(a) . . . In 5A Moore’s Federal Practice (2dEd.) 2706, § 52-06 [1] it is stated: 'The purpose of findings of fact is threefold: as an aid in the trial judge’s process of adjudication; for purposes of res judicata and estoppel by judgment; and as an aid to the appellate court on review.’ The findings of the trial court in this case (and in the case sub judice) are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spivey v. MaysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Lovell v. FrankumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Kingston Development Co. v. KenerlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Pinkerton & Laws Co. v. Atlantis Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- General Teamsters Local Union No. 528 v. Allied Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crook v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Canal Insurance v. P & J Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Paxton v. TRUST COMPANY BANK OF GWINNETT COUNTYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Doyal Development Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.