Legal Opinion

Styrnbrough v. Cambridge Savings Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 6, 1937PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This action of contract or tort was brought in the Superior Court. Claim by the plaintiff for a jury trial was indorsed on the writ. The defendant also claimed a jury trial. The defendant filed on the same day a demurrer on the sole ground that the declaration “does not set forth sufficient facts to entitle the plaintiff to maintain his action,” a so called “plea in bar” setting up the defence of adjudication by a previous case, and an answer denying generally the allegations of the declaration. The demurrer was overruled and the defendant appealed. A motion by the defendant to amend its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Churchill v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Barrell v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. DiRuscio v. PopoliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Gallagher v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Baskin v. PassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Lucier v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API