Legal Opinion
Barrell v. Globe Newspaper Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The two first named cases are actions of tort. The third case is a petition to establish exceptions arising on a motion in the Superior Court to dismiss the exceptions of one of the defendants, the Post Publishing Company, for failure to prosecute. The main controversy arises out of two actions of tort by the same plaintiff, one against the Post Publishing Company, the other against the Globe Newspaper Company. The cases were tried together. They were not merged into one case but remained separate and distinct trial actions. Lumiansky v. Tessier, 213 Mass. 182, 188, 189. It is stated in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Doherty v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Crawford v. RolosonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Commonwealth v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Schaffer v. LeimbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- O'Toole v. MagoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.