Bank of America NT & SA v. David W. Hubert, P.C.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Madsen, J.
Bank of America challenges the Court of Appeals decision reversing the trial court’s summary judgment in its favor. The issues are (1) whether Key Bank or Sterling Savings Bank is the payor bank under RCW 62A.4-105; (2) whether failure by a payor bank to dishonor an NSF (not sufficent funds) check under the “midnight deadline” rule renders a collecting bank accountable; and (3) whether David W. Hubert, RC. (Hubert P.C.), may be liable for negligent supervision where a paralegal managing the Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (IOLTA account) engaged in a check-kiting scheme. We…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of SequimWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Mark D. Dean, P.S.C. v. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.