Legal Opinion

BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA v. Hubert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. 73970-6PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

101 P.3d 409 (2004)

153 Wash.2d 102

BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA f/k/a Seafirst Bank, a National Banking Institution, Petitioner,

v.

DAVID W. HUBERT, P.C., a Washington Corporation; David W. Hubert and Katharine Hubert, individually and the marital community, Respondents, and

M. Gail Kurpgewiet a/k/a M. Gail Williams and John Doe Williams, individually and the marital community, Defendants.

No. 73970-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 18, 2004.

Erika Balazs, Jed William Morris, Spokane, for Petitioner.

Patrick N. Rothwell, Davis Rothwell Mullin Earle & Xochihua, Seattle, for Respondents.

MADSEN…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of SequimWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mark D. Dean, P.S.C. v. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API