Legal Opinion

Hales v. Green Colonial, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 24, 1975No. 1625PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.

This diversity case raises the question, not heretofore decided by Missouri courts, of whether and under what circumstances a supplier and distributor who have been held strictly liable in tort for selling a defective product may seek indemnity from the manufacturer of the product. For the reasons which we shall state, we find and conclude that the supplier and distributor in this case are entitled to indemnity from the manufacturer.

In June of 1970 plaintiff Dean Hales contacted a plumbing and heating specialist about installing a heating…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Newmark v. Gimbel's IncorporatedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Turbine Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
  3. Welkener v. Kirkwood Drug Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Olch v. Pacific Press & Shear Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API