Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 30, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0115PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This declaratory relief action (DRA), which arises from an underlying product liability action (the Naranjo case), involves the seller’s claim for indemnity against the manufacturer. The manufacturer, appellant Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the seller, appellee A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc. 1 Based on both statutory and common law grounds, the trial court ordered Bridge-stone to indemnify A.P.S. for thirty percent of the judgment entered against A.P.S. in the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Cortez v. Avalon Care Center Tucson, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API