United States v. 364.82 Acres of Land
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
In this action to condemn land located within the boundaries of Yosemite National Park, for the use and development of the park, plaintiff United States of America seeks a protective order under Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure prohibiting the taking of depositions from Government appointed land appraisers. The Government requests an order prohibiting inquiry into the following: (1) the appraiser’s opinion of the value of the property; (2) the appraiser’s opinion of the highest and best use of the property; (3) any matter of opinion, or conclusion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Horace MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Franks v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1966
- Congregation Sons of Zion v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- James v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
- United States v. 59.95 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1969