Legal Opinion
James v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 30, 2002No. CIV.S-01-0300 WBS JFMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHUBB, Chief Judge.
On December 10, 2001, defendant United States of America moved to dismiss this action on the ground that plaintiffs failed to present a timely administrative claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). On December 14, 2001, this court granted the motion to dismiss and entered judgment in favor of defendant. (See December 14, 2001 Order). Plaintiffs now move for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) subparts (1) and (6).
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In June of 1999, plaintiffs Laura and Charles James filed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Community Dental Services, Dba Smilecare Dental Group v. Stuart Tani, DdsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Clarissa Brady,plaintiff-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Douglas A. Scott v. PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026