Legal Opinion
Maurer v. Pitchess
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 21, 1981No. CV 79-3814-IH(M)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a state prisoner, has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure the plaintiff’s presence at the trial of his above-entitled civil action. This court finds that it has the discretionary power to issue the writ. However, in the exercise of its discretion, the court denies the plaintiff’s application for the writ.
The plaintiff is a California state prisoner who is now incarcerated in Folsom state prison in Represa, California,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jeff T. Stone v. Ernest E. Morris, Assistant Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet Branch Segregation UnitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Gary William Holt v. Jerry Pitts, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Muhammad v. Warden, Baltimore City JailCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LahoudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Craigo v. MarshallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Greene v. PruntyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1996
- Muhammad v. Warden, Baltimore City JailCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.