Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lahoud

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1985No. 776PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*62WIEAND, Judge:

Does a trial court abuse its discretion when it refuses a defense request to exercise extraordinary steps for obtaining the presence at trial of a paid police informant who has been accepted into the federal witness protection program? We hold that there was no abuse of discretion where, as here, the defendant failed to show that the witness had information favorable to the defense.

During the summer of 1981, federal and state law enforcement agencies launched an extensive undercover investigation into an international drug trafficking operation believed to be working out of a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DelligattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. StantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. KornickiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API