Legal Opinion

People v. Cofer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 26, 1985No. 3-84-0706PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

Following an implied consent hearing, the trial court ruled that the defendant, Gary C. Cofer, did not refuse to complete the requested chemical test. The State appeals that portion of the court’s order, arguing the court misinterpreted and incorrectly applied the implied consent statute (hereinafter the statute) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 95½, par. 11 — 501.1), to the instant circumstances. We agree.

Since the appellant failed to include a verbatim report of proceedings in the record on appeal, we base our review upon the certified report of proceedings. 87 Ill. 2d R. 323(c).

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. SchuberthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Balmes v. Hiab-Foco, A.B.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. People v. NaseefAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. KissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geiger v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. KlyczekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. BentleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Geiger v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. CoferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API