Legal Opinion

People v. Naseef

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 24, 1984No. 3-83-0633PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

This case comes to us on the State’s certification that a suppression order of the trial court substantially impairs its ability to prosecute. The relevant order excluded from evidence certain statements of the defendant, Robert T. Naseef. The State argues that the court erred in excluding the defendant’s statements. We affirm.

The defendant was ticketed for driving under the influence of alcohol. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 951/2, par. 11-501(a).) When the defendant was in the arresting officer’s squad car, the officer, Randy Reagan, requested that the defendant take a breath analysis test. He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. DednamIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. SchuberthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Continental Illinois National Bank & Co. v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Matter of SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Gleason v. Village of Peoria HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. GrazianoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API