Legal Opinion

Geiger v. Hjelle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1986No. Civ. 11259PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

The Highway Commissioner revoked Robert N. Geiger’s driving privileges for refusing a breath test. On appeal by Geiger, the district court affirmed and so do we.

The sole issue is the sufficiency of the evidence to show that Geiger refused to submit to the test. N.D.C.C., § 39-20-05(3). As a “conclusion of law,” the hearing officer held that “Geiger refused to submit to a chemical test.” But the label on a finding is not conclusive, Quandee v. Skene, 321 N.W.2d 91, 94 (N.D.1982), and we view this determination as a finding of fact. Our review considers whether a preponderance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rozan v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hammeren v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pladson v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Peterson v. HartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Quandee v. SkeneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Evans v. BackesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of Stone Creek Channel ImprovementsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Salter v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mayo v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Syverson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API