Legal Opinion

United States v. Leonard

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 16, 1978No. Civ-76-70PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

The United States brings this action under the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2651, and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201. The Government seeks to recover the reasonable value of medical care and treatment furnished to defendant Michael Leonard at the Government’s expense and, in addition, requests a permanent injunction against defendant Leonard instituting or pursuing any action against defendant Hartford Insurance Group for the value of said care. In the alternative, the Government claims that it is entitled to recover its expenses under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Joseph M. Haynes and Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Government Employees Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heusle v. National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Dairyland Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Question Submitted by the United States Court of Appeals v. Criterion InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Government Employees Insurance v. RozmyslowiczDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. AndujarDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API