Legal Opinion
Heusle v. National Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 25, 1980No. Nos. 79-2483, 79-2690 and 80-1072PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
The Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 40, §§ 1009.101-.701 (Purdon Supp. 1980), radically changed the legal liabilities of the state’s automobile operators and their insurers. In this appeal, we conclude that one consequence of that legislation is to deny the federal government reimbursement for medical expenses incurred as a result of injuries received by a member of the Armed Forces in an automobile collision. We also determine that amounts expended by the government for the medical care of a person on active duty…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Andrew GeraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Franklin StudivantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James F. Merrigan and James F. Merrigan, Jr., and Third-Party v. Thomas J. McKinney Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Zagari v. GralkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Tommy Duane Thomas, Jr. And Marilyn Kay Terrell, His Parent and Guardian, and United States of America v. Gerald Shelton and Barbara SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Fanning v. AcroMed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Dairyland Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.