Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1973No. Civ. 40168PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
On June 15, 1971, plaintiff filed a verified petition for a peremptory writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § § 1084-1087.) Named as defendants were the City of Los Angeles, the Board of Administration of the City Employees’ Retirement System, and the manager-secretary of the board. This is an appeal by those defendants from a judgment which ordered issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate, commanding them to consider and act upon the merits of plaintiff’s application for disability retirement benefits.
Plaintiff’s petition alleged: he was a member of the city employees’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Myers v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Johnstone v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dillard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. WolcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Hadley v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.