Legal Opinion

People v. Wolcott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1983No. Crim. 22295PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

Defendants Robert Johnston and Charles Wolcott bring a consolidated appeal from judgments of conviction for robbery, attempted robbery, and other crimes. They raise several contentions, which we resolve as follows:

*96(1) We reject Johnston’s contention that the trial court should have instructed sua sponte that assault with a deadly weapon is a lesser included offense in a charge of robbery enhanced by use of a firearm. As we explain, the contention fails on three grounds: assault is not a lesser included offense in robbery; a “use” enhancement is not part of the accusatory…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API