Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Columbus, Div. of Water

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1993No. 93AP-815PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Judge.

Plaintiff, Roger Wooten, appeals from a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to defendant, city of Columbus, Division of Water. Plaintiff raises three assignments of error, as follows:

“I. The trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs first cause of action (Section 504) since a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether plaintiff was ‘handicapped’ as that term is used in Section 504 of the rehabilitation act.
“II. The trial court erred when it granted defendant’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hazlett v. Martin Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Raya v. Maryatt IndustriesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  4. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Philip R. Plant v. Morton International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Lee Brenneman v. Medcentral Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Reddy v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  5. Shaver v. Wolske & BlueOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API