Legal Opinion

Arterburn v. County of Redwood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1923No. 23,242PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, O.

Certiorari to review the order of the district court of Redwood county awarding compensation to plaintiff from defendant county under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

The county contends that the finding that plaintiff was an employe of the county is wholly without evidence to support it and cannot be sustained.

The facts are not in dispute. The only evidence bearing on the question is a brief stipulation and the testimony of plaintiff himself. At the opening of the hearing it was stipulated:

That in the month of January, 1921, the county of Redwood was graveling its state roads and for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. D. M. Gilmore Co. v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ledoux v. JoncasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Rouse v. Town of Bird IslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Dahl v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Campbell v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Erickson v. KircherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API