State ex rel. D. M. Gilmore Co. v. District Court of Hennepin County
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Hpon the relation of D. M. Gilmore Company the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Hennepin county and the Honorable Charles S. Jelley, one of the judges thereof, to review the judgment of that court in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by Mabel Mattson, widow of Fred Mattson, employee, against D. M. Gilmore Company, employer.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Odrtiorari to review a judgment in a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
The fadts were for the most part stipulated. The D. M. Gilmore Company and the McArdle Gilmore Company are Minnesota corporations doing business in Minneapolis. J. K. Gilmore is the president and principal stockholder of each corporation. On October 1, 1911, a contract was made between the two corporations, whereby, for a specified monthly *13payment, the D. M. Gilmore Company let to the McArdle Gilmore Company a rig, team and teamster, one Fred Mattson, wbo then was and for many years previously had been in the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Turner v. Schumacher Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Krause v. Trustees of Hamline University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Dahl v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.