Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 4, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8078PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Judge.

This appeal arises out of an action commenced by plaintiffs-appellants (referred to herein collectively as Pearce) to recover damages from defendants-appellees (referred to herein collectively as Stone) for conspiracy to commit a fraudulent conveyance. The action is based on the fraudulent schemes’ statute (A.R.S. § 13-2310) as implemented by the civil remedies of the racketeering statutes (A.R.S. § 13-2301(D)(4)(t) and 13-2314(A)) as well as the common law of fraudulent conveyance. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Stone.

Pearce raises two issues on appeal:(1)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. FodorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Arab Monetary Fund v. Hashim (In Re Hashim)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API