Pearce v. Stone
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Judge.
This appeal arises out of an action commenced by plaintiffs-appellants (referred to herein collectively as Pearce) to recover damages from defendants-appellees (referred to herein collectively as Stone) for conspiracy to commit a fraudulent conveyance. The action is based on the fraudulent schemes’ statute (A.R.S. § 13-2310) as implemented by the civil remedies of the racketeering statutes (A.R.S. § 13-2301(D)(4)(t) and 13-2314(A)) as well as the common law of fraudulent conveyance. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Stone.
Pearce raises two issues on appeal:(1)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. FodorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Arab Monetary Fund v. Hashim (In Re Hashim)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.