State v. Fodor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Presiding Judge.
Diane Fodor (“defendant”) appeals from her convictions of two counts of perjury, both class 4 felonies, arising from her testimony before the state grand jury investigating a coverup in the bombing death of reporter Don Bolles. At trial, the state introduced evidence of a wiretapped telephone conversation between defendant and attorney Tom Henze to prove that defendant perjured herself in her grand jury testimony.
We must decide the following issues: (1) whether the attorney-client privilege bars admission of the June 18, 1990, wiretapped telephone conversation…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State of Arizona v. Patricia A. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.