Legal Opinion

State v. Fodor

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 11, 1994No. 1 CA-CR 91-1524PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Presiding Judge.

Diane Fodor (“defendant”) appeals from her convictions of two counts of perjury, both class 4 felonies, arising from her testimony before the state grand jury investigating a coverup in the bombing death of reporter Don Bolles. At trial, the state introduced evidence of a wiretapped telephone conversation between defendant and attorney Tom Henze to prove that defendant perjured herself in her grand jury testimony.

We must decide the following issues: (1) whether the attorney-client privilege bars admission of the June 18, 1990, wiretapped telephone conversation…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. HackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. State of Arizona v. Patricia A. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API