Legal Opinion

Weingarten v. Minskoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action was brought to have plaintiff declared to be entitled to an undivided one-third interest in certain real property. The complaint sets forth the making of an agreement between plaintiff and defendants Minskoff and Leibman, whereby they mutually *751agreed to purchase a parcel of property situated on West One Hundred and Ninety-second street near St. Nicholas avenue in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York; that each of the parties was to have an undivided one-third share therein; the making of a written contract, pursuant to such agreement, for the purchase of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolinsky v. OkunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. McCrum v. Lex Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bienstock v. Nista Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Elghanayan v. ElghanayanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Rosen v. RosenNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Thomas v. RobbertNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Luchter v. PiazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API