Thomas v. Robbert
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
This is a motion by the defendant to cancel a lis pendens filed by the plaintiff. The ground of the motion is that the complaint herein states alleged causes of action which are insufficient in law to sustain such a Us pendens. The defendant cites section 94 of the Real Property Law. That section provides, among other things, that the taking of title to real property in the name of one person, the consideration for which is paid by another, does not result in a trust in favor of the other, unless the taking of the title in the name of the other was without the knowledge of the person paying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Fairchild v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- McKinley v. . HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Smith v. BalcomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Weingarten v. MinskoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kane v. KaneOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Novitsky v. RudaNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Vickers v. VickersNew York Supreme Court · 1935