Legal Opinion

Bienstock v. Nista Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

From an order granting a motion to cancel a lis pendens upon filing a surety company undertaking, the plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and the corporate defendant are owners of adjoining lots. The defendants commenced the erection of a six-story building upon its premises. Incidental to this construction, the defendants excavated underneath plaintiff’s ground, entered upon her premises, and erected thereupon a stone retaining • wall running contiguously alongside the defendant’s land, about seventy feet in depth and approximately twenty inches wide, and constructed up to the level of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weingarten v. MinskoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Kipp v. Hill Road Home Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Crampton v. BowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API