Legal Opinion

Wolinsky v. Okun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Morris Wolinsky, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 25th day of October, 1905, granting the defendant’s motion to cancel a lis pendens upon tiling an undertaking under the provisions of section 1671 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and defendant were copartners, engaged in buying and selling real estate in the city of Hew York under a contract filed in the office of the register of the. county of Hew York ; that certain real property described in the complaint was purchased by the plaintiff and defendant for their joint benefit; that by certain fake and fraudulent representations made by the defendant the plaintiff was induced to convey to the defendant the plaintiff’s undivided half interest in the property so purchased; that the defendant had contracted for a sale…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weingarten v. MinskoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Mulholland v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Siegel v. SilverstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Luchter v. PiazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. In re the Estate of SakowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API