Legal Opinion

Wurz v. Santa Fe International Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 29, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 76-216Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Robert Wurz and his wife Margie Wurz bring this suit seeking compensation for personal injuries that Wurz allegedly suffered on three different occasions while employed as a marine pipe layer superintendent aboard a barge allegedly owned and operated by the defendants. Federal court jurisdiction is predicated on the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688) and on the general maritime law of the United States. Plaintiffs’ complaint, which was filed on July 2, 1976, is based on three distinct'causes of action: (1) negligence; (2) unseaworthiness (all alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. McAllister v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API