Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Camerano
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 26, 1997No. 96-P-420PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
In order to convict Antonio Camerano, the defendant, of conspiracy to possess marihuana with intent to distribute it (G. L. c. 94C, § 40), the Commonwealth was bound to prove that Camerano had agreed with his tenant, Robert Howell, to cultivate, cure, process, and sell marihuana. See Commonwealth v. Cook, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 668, 671 (1980). See also Attorney Gen. v. Tufts, 239 Mass. 458, 493 (1921); Commonwealth v. Nelson, 370 Mass. 192, 196 (1976); Commonwealth v. Pratt, 407 Mass. 647, 653-654 (1990); Commonwealth v. Nighelli, 13 Mass. App. Ct. 590, 593-594 & n.3 (1982), which collect…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goldman v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. StoicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. DiRussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. CostaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.