Oklahoma City v. Tyetenicz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
The defendant in error, as a riparian owner of land along the North Canadian river, sued the municipal corporation, plaintiff in error, on account of pollution of the stream resulting from an improper disposal of sewage. The odors arising from the waters flowing through plaintiff’s lands and the deposit of foreign substances along the banks of the river and the pollution of the waters about plaintiff’s farm constituted an abatable or temporary nuisance.
Plaintiff’s sole proof going to the measure or amount of damages suffered by him was the testimony of Berry Lane, who lived two miles farther…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. FulghamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Sheridan Oil Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Duncan v. FlaglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Helmerick & Payne, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.