Midland Valley R. Co. v. Fulgham
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western» District of Arkansas. Action by J. T. Eulgham, administrator of E. C. Pogue, against the-Midland Valley Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff (167 Eed. 660), and both parties bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff below, the administrator of the estate of E. C. Pogue, brought an action against the Midland Valley Railroad Company for negligence which he alleged caused the-death of Mr. Pogue, a former employé of the railroad company and-the conductor of a train which his crew was making up at a station at the time of the accident in which he died. When that accident happened, Mr. Pogue was walking along the side of the train with his-book in his hand taking the numbers of the cars. ■ Commencing at the rear there were upon this track, first, two or three cars; second,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Railroad Company v. PollardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Carter Oil Co. v. Independent Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Canadian Northern Ry. Co. v. SenskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1942
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.