Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Flagler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 20, 1942No. 30825PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAYLESS, J. J.
R. Duncan and C. R. Duncan appeal from a judgment of the district court of Grady county, based on the verdict of a jury, in favor of Dr. Edith Flagler, who sued the defendants to recover damages for injuries to her business occasioned, as she alleged, from a nuisance created and maintained by defendants.
Defendants present five propositions. Four of these relate to one issue of law and the other to an instruction given. We direct our attention first to the four relating to the issue of law. J. R. Duncan owned and operated an ice plant at Chickasha and C. R. Duncan was his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Nunnelly v. Southern Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Village of St. Johnsbury v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Oklahoma City v. TyeteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- Mabel Pearl Scott v. C. H. Huffman and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Keeley v. Manor Park Apts., SEC. 1Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.