Legal Opinion

Helmerick & Payne, Inc. v. Green

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1938No. 28353PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action to recover for damage alleged to have been caused by the pollution of a stream occasioned by the operation of an oil and gas well owned by defendant. Plaintiff alleged that defendant operated a well on the watershed lying above plaintiff’s land, and permitted salt water and other poisonous substances to escape into a stream running from defendant’s premises down across the land occupied by plaintiff. Plaintiff, holding the premises under a year to year lease, sought to recover on four causes of action, the second of which was dismissed at the trial. For his first causé of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burden v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Oklahoma City v. TyeteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Evans v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Sallee v. CraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refining Co. v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Leslie v. HammerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Sample v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co. v. HuckabySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API