Teale v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County, and from an order denying a new trial. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries which the complaint alleges that the plaintiff,Annie E. Teale, suffered through the negligence of the defendant.
The jury by whom the issues of fact were tried found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her damages in the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, for which amount judgment was entered in her favor.
The defendant has brought the case to this court by appeals from the judgment and order denying it a new trial.
The complaint, which is in four counts, alleges (in the third count) that the plaintiff, on the evening of January 21,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Cary v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Falls v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Abbot v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Holt v. Southwest Missouri Electric Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rocca v. Tuolumne County Electric Power & Light Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Sellars v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Greenleaf v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Morris v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Alask Freight Lines, a Corporation v. Raymond HarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955