Legal Opinion

Cary v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1910No. L.A. No. 2417PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff Sarah P. Cary while debarking from one of defendant’s cars. The negligence, and the only negligence charged against defendants is found in the following allegation:

“And as said Sarah P. Cary was in the act of leaving said electric car, while the same remained stopped and while in the act of stepping off of said car, the said defendant through its agents and servants, negligently and carelessly and wantonly caused the said car to start forward with a sudden jerk, and with great force,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ellinger v. Phila., Wilmington & Baltimore R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Snyder v. Colorado Springs & Cripple Creek District Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Atkinson v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. McKeon v. LissnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Wilbur v. Emergency Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API